About Circumcision          Product Reviews         About the Natural Foreskin Cure        About Glansie       About the Gentle Foreskin Stretcher        Ask an Expert         About Me
    

 
 Phimosis Relief
in 24 Hours...
 

p

The Foreskin Fight- Is It Just a Piece Of Useless Skin…Or Not?

Medical Researcher, Chris Moore is educating men in a battle to end unnecessary adult circumcision.

By Daniel Barrett
Los Angeles, California
 

Chris Moore is a man on a mission to save adult foreskins.  How did his strange passion get started?  He almost made what he feels would have been the biggest mistake of his life - getting circumcised.  Ever since he made some shocking medical discoveries, he has used his website, www.NaturalForeskinCure.com and other means to educate men about what they would be losing and stop unnecessary adult circumcision.

There has been a steady decline in male newborn circumcision in North America since 1971 when the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) reported that there are no valid medical reasons for infant  circumcision.  In 1999, the AAP issued yet another statement discouraging the routine practice of newborn circumcision.  Shortly thereafter, the American Medical Association also declared that there is no proven medical benefit for infant circumcision.  The Canadian Pediatric Society calls circumcision an “obsolete” procedure. 

As a result of these announcements, in 2006 the overall rate of infant circumcision in the United States was reported as being less than half at 48.3%.  In Canada, currently 48% of adult males are circumcised although the reported incidence of newborn circumcision there in 2005 was only 9.2%. 

Four-fifths of the world’s men are not circumcised.  Circumcision is uncommon in Asia, South America, Central America, and most of Europe.  Doctors in these countries are well versed in the care of the fully intact male anatomy; not so in North America.  Doctors here are quick to recommend circumcision for most minor problems. 

This leaves these men to turn elsewhere to seek effective alternatives to circumcision when diagnosed with common problems such as “phimosis”.  This condition occurs when the foreskin of intact men is too tight to be fully retracted.  This can lead to problems ranging from mild discomfort to persistent urinary tract infections and the inability to have intercourse without extreme pain.

If left untreated, phimosis can lead to a more serious condition called “paraphimosis” which occurs when the tight foreskin is pulled back and is caught behind the head of the penis.  Blood flow can be cut off and lead to gangrene or even auto-amputation if not treated quickly.

The first thing these uninformed doctors recommend for any problem involving the foreskin is circumcision.  This is completely unnecessary and most undesirable.  In fact it is estimated that nine out of ten adults being circumcised do not need the surgery!  Aside from the pain, physical and emotional trauma, cost and down time, what is the big deal with cutting off this “piece of skin”? 

Chris Moore was one of these men with a foreskin that was too tight and was about to go under the knife.  Moore is also a medical researcher.  When he started researching about his own problem, he discovered that there are thousands of men who are desperately attempting to regain, re-grow and even surgically replace their lost foreskins.  Moore had to find out why they so desperately wanted back what he was about to give up.  What he discovered shocked him.

It has been reported that 100% of circumcised men suffer from reduced sensitivity and sexual response.  Additionally, it has been estimated that the uncircumcised male has 10 times the sexual pleasure and satisfaction than a circumcised male.  Does this sound like an old wives tale to you?  It did to Moore so he turned to science for the facts.

Moore found out the foreskin is not simply “just a piece of skin” as was commonly thought.  It is a highly sensitized part of the body and its removal also removes several critical components of the male sexual anatomy.  Without the foreskin, around 80% of the penis' erogenous zones are lost which are important for realizing the fullness and intensity of sexual response.